« March 2017 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
ART NEWS
COMMUNITY INTEREST
DUFFY Media Publications
FASHION NEWS
REEALY?
Welcome to the Blog
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile

DUFFY'S CULTURAL COUTURE
Friday, 3 March 2017
China's 'Kung Fu Grandma' still teaching martial arts at 93
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST

 

 

 



 


China's 'Kung Fu Grandma' still teaching martial arts at 93

 

 

 China's 93-year-old "Kung Fu Grandma" has been practicing martial arts for 89 years and says she has no plans to stop anytime soon.

 

Zhejiang province resident Zhang Hexian, 93, dubbed the "Kung Fu Grandma," said she started learning kung fu from her father when she was only a toddler.

 

"I started when I was four years old," Zhang told CNN. "It's my family tradition that has lasted more than 300 years."

 

"I was born in 1924, at a time when China was at war with other countries," she said. "So [kung fu] was also a good way to learn self defense."

 

"My dad took me to sleep at that time. When we woke up in the morning, we started practicing kung fu in bed. I learned basic martial arts skills such as pushing palm and throwing a punch at an early age," Zhang told Chinese news agency CCTV.

 

Zhang, whose hometown is known as "the village of martial arts" due to the popularity of kung fu, followed in her father's footsteps by instructing her family. She said many of her family members have now moved away, so she teaches her neighbors.

 

Zhang said she was amused to learn that she had become famous as the "Kung Fu Grandma" online.

 

"I never thought about being famous," she said. "If people love kung fu, my family can teach them. We have been teaching people around here -- but I never imagined we'd get the attention of others around the world."


Posted by tammyduffy at 12:01 AM EST
Updated: Friday, 3 March 2017 7:41 PM EST
Wednesday, 1 March 2017
Toxic Town
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST

 

 

 
 
 
  TOXIC TOWN
 
 
 

Congoleum demolition on Sloan Rd Hamilton NJ



 

Residents in Hamilton, NJ, Mercer County are very worried. They are worried because their leadership again remains silent on a critical issue. 

 

For several months the old Congoleum site on Sloan Rd has been in demolition mode.  Over the past week a unique thing has been happening. 

 

THE GEESE ARE DYING on Sloan Road!!


There are numerous dead geese scattered near the site on a daily basis. Why are all the geese all of the sudden dying since the active demolition at the site?  We have not had a lot of rain and on numerous days during residents daily exercise runs,there are dust clouds that blow through the neighborhood from the site. It's overwhelming. 

 

Initially, during the demolition there were water trucks out there, but that lasted just a few days.  The team drivers driving the demo equipment are also not wearing protective gear. That is not acceptable. They are being exposed to all the toxins on that site. Residents were under the impression that there was a lot of soil, water and other remediation to be done prior to demolition. Everyone is very surprised to see the demo taking place at the expediated rate that it is.


Residents have contacted the township and have received zero response in regards to all these dead geese and the dust plumes. The residents deserve answers.
 


In July 2015 forms were submitted to indicate that liquid phase phthalate had be found at the site.  The detrimental effects of these contaminates are pretty severe.
 

This is a repeat performance by the township leadership. During the demolition of the American Standard factory, allowed contaminates to blow around to the detriment of the residents.  The mayor of the time issued an executive order to stop construction and mandate processes to ensure the safety of the public due to the issues.
 

The residents of the Cornell Heights area deserve a SAFE ENVIRONMENT. This is not acceptable in the eyes of the residents.  The residents  have asked  the DEP for a detailed report and update on what is going on at the site remediation. They want to know what has been done to the surrounding areas to protect the safety of the environment, the waterways and the residents.  The detrimental effects of these contaminates at the site can be pretty severe.
 

The residents of the Cornell Heights in Mercer County, Hamilton Township, area deserve a SAFE ENVIRONMENT! the lack of continued response from the leadership is not acceptable. So residents reached out to the DEP and they look forward to their response.

We hope to see in the near future a detailed report and update on what is going on at the site remediation. They have also asked the DEP what they are doing to ensure the safety of the surrounding Miry Run area, and the waters surrounding the area, since the demolition began.


Posted by tammyduffy at 8:18 AM EST
Sunday, 26 February 2017
How Safe Are Residents in Hamilton, Mercer County?
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

How Safe Are Residents in Hamilton, Mercer County?

 

 

 

The leadership has been silent on crime of late. Residents interviewed do not feel safe. The feelings of residents are clearly justified in the recent crime reports. The reports demonstrate the following:  These results come directly from  NJSP (New Jersey State Police reports).

 

 

 

Hamilton, Mercer County Results from 2015 to 2016

 

 

Robbery by firearm from 2015 to 2016 is up another 190%.

 

Since 2014 Robbery by firearm has gone up 440% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

Robbery by other dangerous weapon up another 133%

 

Since 2014 Robbery by dangerous weapon has gone up 533% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

Assault by gun up another 75%

 

Since 2014 Assault by gun has gone up 200% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

Aggravated Assault up another 5.3%

 

Since 2014 Aggravated Assault has gone up 76.5% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

Forcible and Unlawful entry up another 8%

Since 2014 Forcible and unlawful entry has gone up 76.5% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

Larceny up another 6%

 

Since 2014 larceny has gone up 69.2% in Hamilton NJ, Mercer County in total.

 

By the end of 2015, Rape was up by 63.6%.

By the end of 2015, attempted rape was up by 100%

 

 

On February 27,2017 the new 2017 NSP report was released. The results so far are demonstrating, comparing Jan 2016 to Jan 2017:

 

Forcible and unlawful entry for Hamilton residents is already demonstrating an already additional 72.7% increase. Forcible entry in the city of Trenton in the new year, demonstrates a 46.3% DECREASE!

 

Unlawful entry for Hamilton residents is already demonstrating an additional 50% increase. Unlawful entry in the city of Trenton in the new year, demonstrates a 57.7% DECREASE!

 

Simple assault for Hamilton residents is already demonstrating an additional 106.3% increase. Simple assault in the city of Trenton in the new year, demonstrates a 35.3% increase. Hamilton is demonstrating a 71% higher rate of simple assault in January than the city of Trenton in 2017.

 

Stay safe everyone....be alert!

 

 


Posted by tammyduffy at 10:41 AM EST
Updated: Sunday, 26 February 2017 11:16 AM EST
ACADEMY RESCINDS SOUND MIXING NOMINATION FOR GREG P. RUSSELL ON "13 HOURS: THE SECRET SOLDIERS OF BENGHAZI"
Topic: ART NEWS

 

 



 

ACADEMY RESCINDS SOUND MIXING NOMINATION FOR 
GREG P. RUSSELL ON "13 HOURS: THE SECRET SOLDIERS OF BENGHAZI"
 
 
 

credit: Robert Gladden / ©A.M.P.A.S.
 

 

 

Upon recommendation by the Sound Branch Executive Committee, the Academy’s Board of Governors voted Thursday (2/23) to rescind the Sound Mixing nomination for Greg P. Russell from "13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi" for violation of Academy campaign regulations.  The decision was prompted by the discovery that Russell had called his fellow members of the Sound Branch during the nominations phase to make them aware of his work on the film, in direct violation of a campaign regulation that prohibits telephone lobbying.  An additional nominee for "13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi" will not be named in his place.  The remaining Sound Mixing nominees for the film are Gary Summers, Jeffrey J. Haboush and Mac Ruth.

 

"The Board of Governors’ decision to rescind Mr. Russell’s nomination was made after careful consideration," said Academy President Cheryl Boone Isaacs.  "The Academy takes very seriously the Oscars voting process and anything – no matter how well-intentioned – that may undermine the integrity of that process."

 

The Board determined that Russell’s actions violated a campaign regulation that unequivocally prohibits telephone lobbying.  It states that "contacting Academy members by telephone to promote a film or achievement is expressly forbidden, even if such contact is in the guise of checking to make sure a screener or other mailing was received."

 

The members from each of the Academy’s branches vote to determine the nominees in their respective categories – actors nominate actors, film editors nominate film editors, musicians, composers and lyricists vote the nominations for song and score.

 

During the nominations process, all 456 voting members of the Sound Branch received a reminder list of film titles eligible in the Sound Mixing category in order to vote.

 

The nominees for Sound Mixing are:

ARRIVAL
Bernard Gariépy Strobl and Claude La Haye

HACKSAW RIDGE
Kevin O’Connell, Andy Wright, Robert Mackenzie and Peter Grace

LA LA LAND
Andy Nelson, Ai-Ling Lee and Steve A. Morrow

ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY
David Parker, Christopher Scarabosio and Stuart Wilson

13 HOURS: THE SECRET SOLDIERS OF BENGHAZI
Gary Summers, Jeffrey J. Haboush and Mac Ruth

 

The 89th Oscars will be held on Sunday, February 26, 2017, at the Dolby Theatre® at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, and will be televised live on the ABC Television Network at 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT.  The Oscars also will be televised live in more than 225 countries and territories worldwide.


Posted by tammyduffy at 8:57 AM EST
Saturday, 25 February 2017
Former Guerrilla Girls Address Art and Activism in a Free Public Program at the Zimmerli on February 27
Topic: ART NEWS

 


 

 

 

Former Guerrilla Girls Address Art and Activism

in a Free Public Program at the Zimmerli on

February 27

 

 Guerrilla Girls

 

 

The Zimmerli Art Museum at Rutgers invites the public to “Artists and Activism: A View from Behind the Gorilla Mask” on Monday, February 27, beginning at 7 p.m.

This free program features two former members of the original Guerrilla Girls, a group of anonymous artists that formed in 1985 to expose inequality within the art world, to discuss their experiences carrying out that mission. Please note that the talk takes place in Voorhees Hall 105, adjacent to the Zimmerli. A public reception follows in the museum lobby.

 

Artists and Activism: A View from Behind the Gorilla Mask” welcomes two guest speakers who discuss their experiences with the Guerrilla Girls, artwork that has been inspired by the group’s mission, and the ongoing efforts of artists to bring attention to the inequality that persists in the art world, often reflecting the attitudes and trends of society at large. From the beginning, the group has used humor and statistics to draw attention to the minimal representation of women and artists of color, as well as the frequent objectification of women in art, in museums and galleries.

 

Over the 30 years of their history, the group has addressed issues such as gender, income inequality in the arts and in business, and the importance of funding for women’s health. Members assume the names of historic women artists and wear gorilla masks in public to conceal their identities, focusing on the issues rather than individuals (a practice the speakers observe). The event coincides with the Zimmerli’s exhibition Guerrilla (And Other) Girls: Art/Activism/Attitude, which includes the group’s witty and incisive posters, on loan from the Rutgers University Libraries Special Collections and University Archives, as well as works by women artists who have been aligned with the group’s mission, drawn mostly from the Zimmerli’s collection. “Artists and Activism” is free and open to the public. For more details, please visit www.zimmerlimuseum.rutgers.edu

 

 

ZIMMERLI ART MUSEUM|RUTGERS

The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum houses more than 60,000 works of art, ranging from ancient to contemporary art. The permanent collection features particularly rich holdings in 19th-century French art; Russian art from icons to the avant-garde; Soviet nonconformist art from the Dodge Collection; and American art with notable holdings of prints. In addition, small groups of antiquities, old master paintings, as well as art inspired by Japan and original illustrations for children’s books, provide representative examples of the museum’s research and teaching message at Rutgers. One of the largest and most distinguished university-based art museums in the nation, the Zimmerli is located on the New Brunswick campus of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Established in 1766, Rutgers is America’s eighth oldest institution of higher learning and a premier public research university.

 

VISITOR INFORMATION

Admission is free to the Zimmerli Art Museum at Rutgers. The museum is located at 71 Hamilton Street (at George Street) on the College Avenue Campus of Rutgers University in New Brunswick. The Zimmerli is a short walk from the NJ Transit train station in New Brunswick, midway between New York City and Philadelphia.

 

The Zimmerli Art Museum is open Tuesday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Saturday and Sunday, noon to 5 p.m., and select first Tuesdays of the month, 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. The museum is closed Mondays and major holidays, as well as the month of August.

 

PaparazZi Café is open Monday through Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Friday, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., with a variety of breakfast, lunch, and snack items. The café is closed weekends and major holidays, as well as the months of July and August.

 

For more information, visit the museum’s website www.zimmerlimuseum.rutgers.edu or call 848.932.7237.

 

SUPPORT

The Zimmerli’s operations, exhibitions, and programs are funded in part by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, and income from the Avenir Foundation Endowment and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Endowment, among others. Additional support comes from the New Jersey State Council of the Arts and the Estate of Victoria J. Mastrobuono; and donors, members, and friends of the museum.

 


Posted by tammyduffy at 8:48 AM EST
Saturday, 18 February 2017
Driverless Cars and the Freedoms They Can Bring
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST

 

 

 

 


Driverless Cars and the Freedoms They Can Bring

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAK0J8Uhzk

 

 

Technology in transportation is not new. In fact, the airplane, the automobile, the train and the horse-drawn carriage all introduced new opportunities and new complications to the safe movement of people and goods.

 

As the digital era increasingly reaches deeper into transportation, the U.S. Department of Transportation has the task to not only to keep pace, but to ensure public safety while establishing a strong foundation such that the rules of the road can be known, understood, and responded to by industry and the public. The self-driving car raises more  possibilities and more questions than perhaps any other transportation innovation under present discussion. That is as it should be. Possessing the potential to uproot personal mobility as we know it, to make it safer and even more ubiquitous than conventional automobiles and perhaps even more efficient, self-driving cars have become the  archetype of our future transportation. Still, important concerns emerge. Will they fully replace the human driver? What ethical judgments will they be called upon to make? What socioeconomic impacts flow from such a dramatic change? Will they disrupt the nature of privacy and security? Many of these larger questions will require longer and more thorough dialogue with government, industry, academia and, most importantly, the public.
 

As the DOT is charged with protecting the traveling public, we recognize three realities that necessitate this guidance. First, the rise of new technology is inevitable. Second, we will achieve more significant safety improvements by establishing an approach that translates our knowledge and aspirations into early guidance. Third, as this area evolves, the “unknowns” of today will become “knowns” tomorrow. We do not intend to write the final word on highly automated vehicles here. Rather, we intend to establish a foundation and a framework upon which future Agency action will occur.

 

For the last 50 years, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has been committed to saving lives and improving safety and efficiency in every way Americans move—by planes, trains, automobiles, bicycles, foot, and more. DOT, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), has carried out that mission on U.S. roadways in part by consistently embracing new technologies that make driving, riding, biking, and walking safer. Twentieth century automobile technologies (such as seat belts, air bags, child seats, and antilock brakes)—developed in the private sector and brought to the nation’s driving public through NHTSA’s safety programs and regulatory authority—are responsible for saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

 

Today, the automobile industry is on the cusp of a technological transformation that holds promise to catalyze an unprecedented advance in safety on U.S. roads and highways. The development of advanced automated vehicle safety technologies,  including fully self-driving cars, may prove to be the greatest personal transportation revolution since the popularization of the personal automobile nearly a century ago.


For DOT, the excitement around highly automated vehicles (HAVs) starts with safety. Two numbers exemplify the need. First, 35,092 people died on U.S. roadways in 2015 alone. Second, 94 percent of crashes can be tied to a human choice or error.   An important promise of HAVs is to address and mitigate that overwhelming majority of crashes.

 

Whether through technology that corrects for human mistakes, or through technology that takes over the full driving responsibility, automated driving innovations could dramatically decrease the number of crashes tied to human choices and behavior. HAVs also hold a learning advantage over humans. While a human driver may repeat the same  mistakes as millions before them, an HAV can benefit from the data and experience drawn from thousands of other vehicles on the road. DOT is also encouraged about the potential for HAV systems to use other complementary sensor technologies such as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) capabilities to improve system performance. These sensor technologies have their own potential to reduce the number and severity of crashes, and the inclusion of V2V and V2I capabilities could augment the safety and performance of HAV systems.

 

The benefits don’t stop with safety. Innovations have the potential to transform personal mobility and open doors to people and communities—people with disabilities, aging populations, communities where car ownership is prohibitively expensive, or those who prefer not to drive or own a car—that today have limited or impractical options. Cities will reconsider how space is utilized and how public transit is provided. Infrastructure capacity could be increased without pouring a single new truck load of concrete. HAVs may also have the potential to save energy and reduce air pollution from transportation through efficiency and by supporting vehicle electrification.


There are multiple definitions for various levels of automation and for some time there has been need for standardization to aid clarity and consistency.  The SAE definitions divide vehicles into levels based on “who does what, when.”4 Generally:

 

•• At SAE Level 0, the human driver does everything;
•• At SAE Level 1, an automated system on the vehicle can sometimes assist the human
driver conduct some parts of the driving task;
•• At SAE Level 2, an automated system on the vehicle can actually conduct some parts
of the driving task, while the human continues to monitor the driving environment and
performs the rest of the driving task;
•• At SAE Level 3, an automated system can both actually conduct some parts of the
driving task and monitor the driving environment in some instances, but the human
driver must be ready to take back control when the automated system requests;
•• At SAE Level 4, an automated system can conduct the driving task and monitor the
driving environment, and the human need not take back control, but the automated
system can operate only in certain environments and under certain conditions; and
•• At SAE Level 5, the automated system can perform all driving tasks, under all conditions
that a human driver could perform them.


Imagine getting in your car, typing or speaking a location into your vehicle’s interface, then letting it drive you to your destination while you read a book, surf the web or nap. Self-driving vehicles – the stuff of science fiction since the first roads were paved – are coming, and they’re going to radically change what it’s like to get from point A to point B.

 

The building blocks of driverless cars are on the road now.  The front-crash prevention systems that for several years have been able to warn drivers of an impending obstacle and apply the brakes if they don’t react fast enough.

 

These systems were quickly followed by technology allowing cars to self-park by sizing up a free spot and automatically steering into it, with the driver only controlling the accelerator and brake pedals. Mercedes-Benz took autonomous driving even further with last year’s unveiling of a steering system that works on the highway, in certain circumstances.
 

The first big leap to fully autonomous vehicles is due in 2017, when Google Inc. said it would have an integrated system ready to market. Every major automotive manufacturer is likely to follow by the early 2020s, though their systems could wind up being more sensor-based, and rely less on networking and access to map information. Google probably wont manufacture cars. More likely, it’ll license the software and systems.

 

As with the adoption of any new revolutionary technology, there will be problems for businesses that don’t adjust fast enough. Futurists estimate that hundreds of billions of dollars (if not trillions) will be lost by automakers, suppliers, dealers, insurers, parking companies, and many other car-related enterprises. And think of the lost revenue for governments via licensing fees, taxes and tolls, and by personal injury lawyers and health insurers.

 

Who needs a car made with heavier-gauge steel and eight airbags (not to mention a body shop) if accidents are so rare? Who needs a parking spot close to work if your car can drive you there, park itself miles away, only to pick you up later? Who needs to buy a flight from Boston to Cleveland when you can leave in the evening, sleep much of the way, and arrive in the morning?

 

Indeed, Google’s goal is to increase car utilization from 5-10% to 75% or more by facilitating sharing. That means fewer cars on the road. Fewer cars period, in fact. Who needs to own a car when you can just order a shared one and it’ll drive up minutes later, ready to take you wherever you want?

This has the potential to] dramatically reduce the number of cars on the street, 80% of which have people driving alone in them, and also a household's cost of transportation, which is 18% of their income – around $9,000 a year – for an asset that they use only 5% of the time,” said Robin Chase, the founder and CEO of Buzzcar, a peer-to-peer car sharing service, and co-founder and former CEO of Zipcar.

 

In 2030, self-driving cars are expected to create $87 billion worth of opportunities for automakers and technology developers, said a report by Boston-based Lux Research. Software developers stand to win big.

 

If you’re an automaker, such as Ford Motor Co. (F), General Motors Co. (GM), Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota Motor Corp. or Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC), which account for about 70% of the U.S. market, you could see an initial surge in the $600 billion in annual new and used car sales in the U.S. But as soon as the technology takes hold, sales could fall off significantly as sharing popularizes.

 

Cars will always need steel, glass, an interior, a drivetrain and some form of human interface (even if that interface is little more than a wireless connection to your smartphone). But much of everything else could change. As an example, take front-facing seats; they could become an option, not a requirement. Automakers that see change coming, such as how the big profits are secured downstream by car servicers, insurers and more, are focusing on services as much as on what and how they manufacture.


With fewer cars around, parking lots and spaces that cover roughly a one-third of the land area of many U.S. cities can be repurposed. That could mean temporary downward pressure on real estate values as supply increases. It could also mean greener urban areas, as well as revitalized suburbs, as longer commutes become more palatable. And if fewer cars are on the road, the federal and state governments may be able to reallocate a good portion of the roughly $30 billion spent annually on highways.


If you’re in the business of finding, extracting, refining and marketing hydrocarbons, such as Exxon Mobil Corp. (EOX), Chevron Corp. (CVX) or BP plc (BP), you could see your business fluctuate as use changes. These vehicles should practice very efficient eco-driving practices, which is typically about 20% better than the average driver. On the other hand, if these cars are owned by individuals, we could see a huge rise in the number of trips, and vehicle miles traveled. People will send out their car to run errands they would never do if they had to be in the car and waste their own time. If the autonomous cars are shared vehicles and people pay for each trip, I think this will reduce demand, and thus (vehicle miles traveled).

Autonomous vehicles are also expected to be safer. These cars won't get drunk or high, drive too fast, or take unnecessary risks – things people do all the time. Over 90% of accidents today are caused by driver error.  There is every reason to believe that self-driving cars will reduce frequency and severity of accidents, so insurance costs should fall, perhaps dramatically.

 

Cars can still get flooded, damaged or stolen.  However, this technology will have a dramatic impact on underwriting. A lot of traditional underwriting criteria will be upended. According to a University of Texas report, if only 10% of the cars on U.S. roads were autonomous, more than $37 billion of savings could be realized via less wasted time and fuel, as well as fewer injuries and deaths. At 90%, the benefit rises to almost $450 billion a year.


Self-driving cars could have a substantial impact on the taxi and limousine industries and could create new ones.  They could be used to share specific trips as a kind of pay-as-you-go small-scale public transportation – taking a disparate bunch of Manhattanites to the beach in the Hamptons, for instance.

 

One study found that a fleet of 9,000 driverless taxis could serve all of Manhattan at about 40 cents per mile (compared to about $4-6 per mile now). There are licenses for over 13,000 taxis in the Big Apple now. Self-driving cars may also challenge train lines. A self-driving car offers much of the convenience of rail service with the added convenience that the service is portal-to-portal rather than station-to-station.  On the other hand, a fleet of self-driving cars available at the station may make rail service more palatable.  The technology has already been adopted in closed systems, such as campuses, air-terminals and mining. Rio Tinto Group (RIO), a large mining company, uses enormous self-driving trucks in its mining operations. European countries are experimenting with the platooning of trucks. Among other things, this saves about 18% in fuel.


There are regulatory and legislative obstacles to widespread use of self-driving cars, and substantial concerns about privacy (who will have access to any driving information these vehicles store?). There’s also the question of security, as hackers could theoretically take control of these vehicles, and are not known for their restraint or civic-mindedness.
 

However it plays out, these vehicles are coming – and fast. Their full adoption will take decades, but their convenience, cost, safety and other factors will make them ubiquitous and indispensable. Such as with any technological revolution, the companies that plan ahead, adjust the fastest and imagine the biggest will survive and thrive. And companies invested in old technology and practices will need to evolve or risk dying.

As self-driving cars move toward becoming a reality for the general public, many blind or aging people and those with disabilities see a new opportunity for mobility approaching. Advocates are pushing manufacturers and regulators to ensure that people with disabilities are included in the planning and development of automated technology and regulation.

 

The desire is to be in that same class of consumers with people who are already on the roads. If there’s an autonomous car, there needs to be a means by which a blind person can operate that car as well.  Both people with disabilities and the manufacturers would benefit from including the disabled and elderly in the debate about the technology – and not just from some sense of social equity. It would behoove the auto industry – auto manufacturers – to certainly keep the elderly and the disabled in mind, as a growing proportion of the American population are aging baby boomers.

 

The vehicles promise new mobility options to those who have missed out on the benefits of a century of automotive history, including people with disabilities, elderly drivers and groups at an economic disadvantage.
 

In a way similar to how settings can be enabled on iPhones or computers to accommodate the blind, the technology can be built into the interface for autonomous vehicles, he said in a phone interview. Cars can be programmed to describe the field of vision to a blind driver and send warnings about tight turns or obstacles through vibrations and other triggers.


There are many technological advances to discuss. NVIDIA, a company based in Santa Clara, California, that designs graphics processing units, has developed a computer for self-driving cars that uses artificial intelligence to learn from new traffic situations and share that information with other cars using the same technology.

 

They can handle the processing of different sensor inputs, and we can do all kinds of sensory outputs, whether it’s touch-based, whether it’s audible or visual.  It’s absolutely updateable, just like your phone is.

 

Still, heightened expectations for self-driving cars are likely to be unrealistic at this point. This is where, unfortunately, the disabled community has been seriously misled by people into thinking that somehow they’re going to have automated vehicles driving them wherever they want to go in the near future. That’s just not going to be feasible.
 

When it comes to aging people and those with disabilities – even among those who once held driver’s licenses – each person’s impairment is different, and determining who can use which cars will present a “nightmare of complexity.

 

NHTSA is crafting federal guidelines for automated vehicles that are expected to include recognition of the needs of blind people and those with other disabilities. Many at the Washington hearing voiced safety concerns, pointing to crash and malfunction reports from trial runs.

 

People disagree about how fast it might happen, but I think that technology has proven that it will happen one day. When that time comes that there actually are cars on the road that are reliably capable of navigating without any intervention from the driver, we intend to be part of that group.

 

Some of the best engineers in the world are working to make this a reality in our communities. Engineers have already solved many of the safety concerns associated with self-driving vehicles. While there’s more to do, these cars are currently being tested on the road. The companies working to bring these vehicles to us are concerned chiefly with safety. They are committed to safety and are actively testing, re-working, re-testing, and validating everything they do to ensure that when---not if, when---these vehicles arrive in our communities, they not only contribute to people's independence, they do so in a way that ensures everyone's safety.



I can imagine my mother in a self-driving vehicle, commuting to her favorite mall for the daily walk. I can imagine my friend with a disability who relies on Metro Mobility for transportation, hopping in a self-driving vehicle to meet friends for a celebration.


 
The technology making this possible is new and can be scary---like many of the technologies that we have made part of our everyday lives. A whole lot of very smart people are rapidly evolving this possibility and it won’t be long before it’s ready and safe for mass production. Imagine what it could mean for you, your family, and our community.

 

Some day you can finally put Fido to work for you. Strap them into your self driving vehicle and they can go run your errands for you. Order what you want on line and they go and pick it up for you. 



Posted by tammyduffy at 8:00 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, 18 February 2017 8:02 AM EST
Saturday, 11 February 2017
East Trenton Art Show
Topic: ART NEWS


 

 

EAST TRENTON ART SHOW

 

 

 
 
 
SAVE THE DATE
 
Date: Saturday, May 13, 2017
 
 
Place: Lawrence Street Community Garden
 
676-678 North Clinton Ave
 
Trenton, NJ
 
Time: 12 noon- 4pm
 
(Set up at 11AM)
 
 
FREE EVENT
 
 
 
All are invited! 
 
 
This event will showcase East Trenton artists. 
 
 
-Music
 
-Poetry
 
-Drawing
 
-Photography
 
-Painting
 
 
Come and see the wonderful talent and beauty the area residents are creating in East Trenton, NJ. The garden will be transformed into a art gallery for the day. 
 
 
 
In the event of rain on Saturday, May 13
the event will take place on May 14, 2017

 

 

 


 

 


Posted by tammyduffy at 9:32 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, 11 February 2017 9:39 AM EST
Saturday, 4 February 2017

 


 

 

GOAT YOGA

 



 

 

 

Lainey Morse didn’t mean to invent a new wellness activity.

 

She certainly didn’t mean to start a vacation trend for city-dwellers seeking an escape from the bustle of modern life, but as of early Thursday morning, her "goat yoga" practice has a waiting list of 1,200 people.

 

They’re waiting to take a regular yoga class on her farm in Albany, Ore., with one addition: Morse’s eight goats will be scurrying about and interacting with the yogis. In the warmer months, the practice takes place in a field. In the colder ones, it moves to a barn.

 

“When the yoga class is going on, they’ll wander around, they’ll curl up on their mats and fall asleep, they’ll cuddle up next to someone and interrupt their pose,” Morse told The Washington Post in a phone interview. Sometimes they climb on to their backs. “The look on these people’s faces is just pure bliss.”

 

It certainly seems to be — reviewers refer to the experience as “calming,” “relaxing” and “fun.”

 

Cherie Twohy, a participant, wrote of the class, “I’ve had a rough couple of years, and this put a smile on my face that I can’t remember feeling in a while.” Another, Abbie Hicks, was even more enthusiastic, writing,” There are no words for how fun and awesome this experience was!”

 

Lauralei Schuster found humor in the experience, writing, “The baby goats played all around us and climbed on laps or chewed on various things while their mamas looked on. The yoga was relaxing and energizing and occasionally hilarious when the goats jumped on someone.”

 

It’s become such a hit that most of the 1,200 will be traveling to join in.

 

“Pretty much no one in my local community comes to these classes. It’s mostly people that live in big cities like Seattle and Portland,” Morse said. “They all live in these big cities, and they don’t get to experience country life or have interaction with goats.”

 

In November, she quit a job she loved at Henderer Design and Build to manage the business full-time. If that sounds like a living encapsulation of the popular Twitter hashtag #FollowYourBliss, perhaps it is, but it’s how Morse has always conducted her life — and how the practice came to exist in the first place.

 

Ten years ago, the outdoorswoman from Michigan found herself living in the tan, endless desertscape of Phoenix, Ariz., desperately missing lush greenery, when she saw a glossy photograph of Oregon in a wall calendar.

 

“It was really mossy and beautiful,” she said. “So I flew into Portland and rented a car” to find a new home. When she rolled into Corvallis, she knew immediately, thinking to herself, “This is where I’m going to live.”

 

“It was a big leap of faith, and it totally paid off,” she said. “That’s why I named my farm No Regrets Farm.”

 

The next order of business in warding off regrets was fulfilling her lifelong dream of owning goats.

 

“I had never had them, never been exposed to them, never even touched one. But I’d see videos and think they’re just such cool animals.” So she acquired two baby goats — which she named Ansel and Adams after the famed photographer — and a copy of "Raising Goats for Dummies."

 

By fall of 2015, four small goats strutted around her farm, but that’s when tragedy doubled down on her.

Already in the middle of a divorce, she was diagnosed with Sjogren’s syndrome, an immune system disorder similar to lupus.

 

“Every day I would come home from work, sit out in my field and spend time with my goats,” Morse recalled. “It ended up being so therapeutic to me. It’s hard to be sad and depressed when you have baby goats jumping around you.”

 

She extended her good fortune to others by inviting harried friends to join her for what she coined Goat Happy Hour and, “by the time they left, they didn’t remember they were stressed.”

 

“When you get baby goats, you get super popular. Everyone wants to come to your house,” she said. “People who are just having an off-day or are depressed will ask if they can come spend some times with my goats.”

 

The crowds at her farm began growing — she even auctioned a child’s birthday party off, which proved fateful: at that party, one of the children’s mothers asked to hold a yoga class in the field with the goats.

 

As news organizations discovered the practice, her clientele grew. Recently, Oregon State University contacted her in hopes of providing goat yoga for some of its students, and Morse has partnered with a local winery to host the most zenful of tranquil activities: goat yoga with a wine tasting.

 

“I think the whole combination of country life, animals and yoga just went so beautifully together that people just resonate with it,” she said. “The world is so stressed out right now, and they don’t want to think about politics, ISIS and war. It’s a happy distraction.”

 

These days, eight goats wander around the tree pose-holding visitors.

 

The veterans are a 100-ish pound boar goat named Dodger, “who had some brain damage when he was a baby. … He’s not quite there, but it makes him so sweet and lovable, so he’s everyone’s favorite now,” and five Nigerian dwarf goats, “which are mini-goats,” Morse gleefully said.


Posted by tammyduffy at 6:23 PM EST
Saturday, 28 January 2017
How Bad Bosses Kill Employee Engagement
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST

 


 

 

How Bad Bosses Kill Employee Engagement

If you’ve ever worked for a bad boss, you’ve probably uttered these famous words …. “I don’t get paid enough to put up with this crap!” Bad bosses destroy morale and employee engagement and, more often than not, they brighten up the whole company when they quit or are finally fired. So what makes someone a bad boss? The following 15 behaviors are a few of our favorites:

 

  1. Doesn’t trust their team: Not trusting their team makes it impossible for their team members to get things done. When managers do not trust their team, they tend to not delegate and end up doing the tasks themselves. With little trust, they justify their command and control management style. The end result is usually a lack of communication with the team, resulting in delayed projects.
  2. Do not value a work-life balance: These bad bosses have little respect for team members’ personal time. These managers feel that since they are the boss, the employee should feel grateful to have a job. With a commodity type of attitude, these managers assume they should have 24-7 access to placing demands on the team members.
  3. Tell, don’t ask: Bad bosses tend to make demands on people without gaining input from the person they’re managing. These bosses tend not to listen well and are not good at taking feedback. Eventually, this bad boss is making decisions on only half of the information available because their team gives up hope that communicating important information will be valued by the manager.
  4. Takes credit and passes the blame: Employee engagement killers love to take the credit when things go exceptionally well…especially when the boss did not do any of the work. On the opposite side of the fence, bad bosses never take responsibility when things don’t go well and feel best when they are throwing someone under the bus and passing the blame.
  5. Practice the “need to know form of communication:” Bad bosses are always too busy to take the time to communicate to the people who will be impacted by the information. They withhold information as a form of power and justify the style as only communicating when people “need to know.”
  6. No recognition: Bad bosses are way too busy to take the time to recognize people for what’s going well or right. But, they always have the time to let someone know when the results don’t meet his or her expectations.
  7. Ungrateful: Bad bosses treat people like a commodity. They couldn’t care less if it is you or someone else who gets the job done, as long as the job gets done. They place almost all their value on the task and very little value on the relationship with the people who are doing the task. Bad bosses have a hard time saying two of the most powerful words in the English language, “thank you.”
  8. Uses disrespectful communication: Bad bosses feel that it’s alright to communicate to someone in a disrespectful manner. This could include swear words or inferring that someone is stupid or didn’t think before they made a decision. Either way, disrespectful communication makes many people feel inferior or inadequate as a team member. Last, disrespectful bosses have the bad habit of giving a team member negative feedback in front of others on the team.
  9. Lie: Bad bosses tend to communicate what they think they need to communicate to accomplish their goal, rather than telling people the truth. The outcome is that team members do not trust anything the boss says because it’s impossible to know when they’re telling the truth.
  10. Brown nose: Bad bosses are great at kissing up to their boss or others in power. To try to make themselves look good, they treat people below them poorly, in hopes of getting even more done.
  11. Always say “I” and seldom say “we”: Bad bosses sound like they are warming up for the opera… My, my my, me, me, me, I, I , I. What bad bosses have trouble saying when great things have been accomplished is we.
  12. Hire mediocre performers: Bad bosses don’t like to be outshined, so they hire people who are not as smart, gifted or talented as they are. Plus, when someone is not at the level of the bad boss, it makes it even easier to talk down to him.
  13. Promote mediocrity: Bad managers don’t encourage people to learn, grow, develop and take risks. They prefer to operate in a status quo environment. One of the bi-products of this is bad managers usually have fewer direct reports who are promoted to other areas in the organization. These managers lack the skills to take on additional responsibilities in the organization because they have been raised in an environment where growth and development has been punished, not rewarded.
  14. Exhibit frequent moodiness: Have you ever worked with a boss where you had to check with others before going into their office to talk with them because you never knew what type of person you were going to meet that day? Sometimes they were happy and a joy to be around. Other times, they were downright nasty. Moody people are one of the most difficult types of people to work for because you don’t know which side of the bed they woke up on.
  15. Play favorites: Bad bosses define loyalty differently than great leaders. Bad bosses define loyalty as how loyal you are to them, no matter what the situation is. They then treat people differently, based on who they determine to be loyal. One way this difference shows up is some people on the team are held accountable, while other poor performers are allowed to slide.
  16. Hidden secrets:They refuse to get their teams input. They never want you to talk to your teammates, they restrict your movement and ability to succeed.  These people normally lack integrity. 


So here are the behaviors that will kill employee engagement. Can you imagine working for a boss like this? I don’t know about you, but I would quit. No one gets paid enough to put up with that crap. Abuse in the workplace is worse than an abusive home. Why you ask? Because you spend more time at work,for most, than you do at home. 

 

 


Posted by tammyduffy at 8:18 AM EST
Sunday, 22 January 2017
Women's March Washington Jan 2017
Topic: COMMUNITY INTEREST


 

 

 Women's March Washington Jan 2017

 

 

 



 https://www.facebook.com/359697407526169/photos/?tab=album&album_id=726682457494327 

 

Other photos from March by Duffy

 

By Tammy Duffy, PhD

 

They thought about 200,000 would come.

 

The number of people who came were 1.3 million and counting to Washington DC, on January 21, for the Women's March on Washington. They came from all walks of life and places in the United States. I spent time speaking with a lot of women, including the homeless on the street. The homeless had the best stories as to why they were at the march. They had the most hope for America.

 

In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new administration on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us. "Women’s March ‘Mission & Vision’"

 

The women and men who walked did so to honor those female warriors before us--the suffragettes, women’s libbers  trailblazers like Margaret Thatcher, Condelleza Rice, Hillary Clinton and others―and give voice to their concerns in a new era. I marched because I am concerned. I am concerned about Women's rights. I did not march to de-legitimize the presidency.  I marched to better understand everyone's position. I am a republican who struggled on who to vote for this election. I did vote. As a scientist I like a more analytical approach to decisions. Selfishly, I want to see this type of decision making with our new administration. 

 

I grew up in the hood. My grandparents lived in East Trenton, NJ. My parents lived in the attic of my one grandparents home when they first got married for year. My Father had his own business and actually did a lot of the steel construction for President Trump's casinos in Atlantic City. I grew up learning how to appreciate that a hard day at work can reap many rewards. My parents had no money to send me to college, yet I was able to achieve a PhD in Health Physics. America is a land of great possibility.If you have passion and time you can do anything no matter how much money you have. 

 

I am concerned with the defunding of Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood believes in the fundamental right of each individual, throughout the world, to manage his or her fertility, regardless of the individual's income, marital status, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, national origin, or residence. PP believes that respect and value for diversity in all aspects of life is essential to our well-being. They also believe that reproductive self-determination must be voluntary and preserve the individual's right to privacy. The government should not be involved in this. Planned Parenthood's ability to train families on the enhancement of the quality of life and strong family relationships is key to a families success. The key to a childs success. The key to America's success.

 

Planned Parenthood also provides comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual. They act as an advocate to public policies which guarantee these rights and ensure access to such services. Their ability to provide educational programs which enhance understanding of individual and societal implications of human sexuality. The video controversy damaged their brand. The videos are believed to be doctored. Who knows the real truth. What I do know is that PP has given the women in the disparate communities of the United States their only resource for healthcare and knowledge for sexual health, etc. Taking this away will severely damage the health care costs and well being of millions in the United States. The communities that utilize these resources are the very people who have the highest health risks.  The education for birth control, HIV/AIDS care and prevention, or medically accurate sexuality education are now defunded for PP. This means open access to safe, legal, affordable abortion and birth control for all people, regardless of income, location or education is viewed as not important to defund it.

 

Ivanka Trump wants to focus on women's issues. Yet, I have never seen or heard that she has visited the bowels of the inner cities to learn what the real issues are for the middle and lower class of America. She needs to come and visit us. She grew up very privileged, she cannot have a clear understanding or background on the real issues that mid and lower class America has. This is not to criticize her, but to guide her on how to develop programs that work and are sustainable. We want her to help us and the only way to do that is to visit us.

 

Women can change a society. We have seen this globally with the implementation of microfunds in poverty stricken countries to women and they transform their communities.

 

Women in America are still 35 percent more likely than men to be poor in America, with single mothers facing the highest risk. Currently, 35 percent of single women with children live and raise their families in poverty.

 

Despite composing nearly half of the workforce, women account for 60 percent of the nation’s lowest paid workers. The salaries for the vast majority of jobs held by women, in industries such as retail and hospitality, are consistently lower than in traditionally male career paths, such as construction, engineering, and energy. For this reason, Legal Momentum is working to expand women’s pathways into non-traditional work, which promises stronger salaries, stable benefits, and a pathway from poverty to prosperity.

 

Women and children account for over 70 percent of the nation’s poor. Unfortunately, the nation’s anti-poverty and safety net programs have repeatedly failed to take into account the reality of women’s lives and provide sufficient provisions for helping women and families escape poverty. Until very recently, and as is still the case in many states, unemployment insurance in most states was limited to full-time workers, leaving part-time workers – the vast majority of whom are women – with no assistance if they lost their jobs. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the country’s main program for addressing family poverty, does not provide enough support to prevent acute material hardships – like hunger, homelessness, and utility cut-offs – for the families that rely on it. Work requirements for women with very young children create even higher hurdles. With women accounting for over 90 percent of adult TANF recipients, reforming this program is critical to alleviating women’s poverty.

 

There are 11.5 million single-mothers in America. While women’s workforce participation has increased, the supply of affordable child care has lagged far behind, meaning that many single moms literally cannot afford to work or have to spend a large share of their meager income on childcare.

 

More than one in eight women, more than 16.9 million, lived in poverty last year. Poverty rates were particularly high for families headed by single mothers — 1 in 3 (36.5 percent) lived in poverty. More than half of all poor children (56.2 percent) lived in female-headed families in 2015.

 

Poverty Rates in District of Columbia

Women: 16.3%

Female- Headed Families: 40.3%

Black women: 23.9%

Hispanic women: 11.3%

Asian women: 15.8%

Native American women: -

Women 65 and older: 15.0%

Children: 25.6%


Poverty Rates in New Jersey

Women: 10.6%

Female-headed families: 33.6%

Asian women: 7.4%

Black women: 17.2%

Hispanic women: 21.0%

Native American women: 16.9%

Women 65 and older: 9.0%

Children: 15.6%


https://nwlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Poverty-State-by-State-2016.pdf

 



 


I do agree that some of the posters women, men and children were carrying during the march were vulgar. There is nothing to gain in that level of vulgarity. Two wrongs do not make a right. I found it disturbing when I saw 10 year old girls walking with their Mom's and the 10 year old was holding a sign that said, "Don't touch my pussy." That kind of parenting is not parenting, it was simple craziness to see that.

 


Fortunately only a few people out of the 1.3 million that attended the march could actually hear the celebrities. The celebrities do not matter. Their voices for the most part are heard only that day, and do not influence or help inhibit a change. There are some that do make a difference, but not every day of their life. Where the celebrities were positioned you could not get near that area on the side of the museum so the vast majority never heard their rhetoric. There is nothing to gain in their vulgarity either.

When you speak to women who went to other marches that day there is a unique thing that happened at all the marches. There was no pushing and shoving, everyone was in a positive energetic mood and there was lots of love in the air. At every march. That alone is simply magnificient. Imagine taking that level of passion, you could change the world.

 


Women's rights are human rights. We need to continue to fight for equal rights and not have reversed Roe Vs Wade. Individual choice matters, its our constitutional right. We need to passionately assert that we will not rest until we ensure that women have the right to control our own bodies, that with hard work and diligence we can break the glass ceilings of our choosing, that we will not tolerate sexual harassment, bullying, and assault by strangers and acquaintances alike, either in color. It is our moral imperative to dismantle the gender and racial inequities within the criminal justice system. It's not ok. Women need to speak up when they are not at marches. I have watched women in corporate America put up with horrible situations for they are afraid to open their mouths about a sexual harassment in workplace. There are too many times that a company does not address it, even when a complaint is filed. That company is worse than the harasser in my opinion when they refuse to address it. Women need to not be afraid and stand their position and demand action.

 

There has to be an economy powered by transparency, accountability, security and equity. All women should be paid equitably, with access to affordable childcare, sick days, healthcare, paid family leave, and healthy work environments. We can only hope that this is addressed with the new administration. All workers – including domestic and farm workers, undocumented and migrant workers - must have the right to organize and fight for a living minimum wage. There are numerous farmers who hire undocumented workers to harvest their crops. They are not paying them what they should. This needs to be corrected.

 

Civil Rights are our birthright, including voting rights, freedom to worship without fear of intimidation or harassment, freedom of speech, and protections for all citizens regardless of race, gender, age or disability. We believe it is time for an all-inclusive Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Every American should feel their voice matters, all the time. To silence the press, the American public is not what democracy is about.  There is no doubt there is so much press tht is dishonest. It is rather disturbing. I do more fact checking with my blog than newspapers do with the articles they print.

During yesterday's march people chanted,"This is what a Democracy looks like."  I felt so proud to be an American yesterday. The inspiration I left DC with yesterday is electric. I did not just march, I want to make a difference for women in America.  I wantour new administration to view the march in DC yesterday as women supporting change. We want positive change and a voice when changes are made.

                                                                 

I try to live every day in solidarity. I believe in social justice, conversations can’t just stop because they’re inconvenient. Everyone must speak up and hold their feet firmly to the ground or change cannot happen. If you change nothing, nothing changes.

 

It's the courageous conversations that women have that opens dialogues with people and groups.  We need to get the youth of America integrated in making change. They are not just our future, they are our present. How do we create space for them?

 

 

The rhetoric of the past election cycle was insulting from both sides to the American public.  We are now confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.  The global marches clearly sent a message. In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington sent a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights. We want to stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us. We want to work together to direct America into the right direction. Everyone needs to embrace each other or we cannot succeed.

 

There were some poignant messages in President Trump's inauguration address:

 

We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore its promise for all of our people.

 


Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.

 

 

And this, the United States of America, is your country.

 


I will fight for you with every breath in my body – and I will never, ever let you down.

 

 

When America is united, America is totally unstoppable.

There should be no fear – we are protected, and we will always be protected

 


You will never be ignored again.

Your voice, your hopes, and your dreams, will define our American destiny. And your courage and goodness and love will forever guide us along the way.

 

The American public needs President Trump to live up to these words. They are very powerful words. They are great words. There will be decisions made that the American public may not like.

 

It will always be important for our new President to let the American public understand the "why" a decision is made.  The politicians of America never to do this. If the 'why" is shared,ie. defunding Planned Parenthood, the possible (as being reported in the press, not sure if this is correct) defunding of the National Endowment of the Arts, etc, Americans better understand the decisions. President Trump was elected because the American public is fed up with the status quo in Washington. They wanted drastic change. He is representative of that drastic change.

 

President Trump needs to be given a chance to change our country whether you voted for him or not. The damage that has been done over the past decade to America is monumental by career politicians who only care about their own pocketbooks and not the American public. I recently sent a letter to 10 NJ politicians on a critical safety issue in my town. We have gotten ZERO response from all 10 politicians. That is disgraceful. This is that status quo in our government though.

 

It will not take overnight to fix and course correct America. The correct facts are important. The way the information is shared with the press and American public is important. The American public is important. I want the leader of our free world to positively impact the rest of my life and those younger than me.

 

To use the words of our President.. with only subtle alteration...

TO all of our people,  we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People. The United States of America, is your country.

 


I will fight for you with every breath in my body – and I will never, ever let you down.

There should be no fear – we are protected, and we will always be protected.

 

 
 

God Bless America and the new President of the USA, President Donald Trump. We want our country back. Fight for us, keep us safe and protected.

 

 

 


Posted by tammyduffy at 1:14 PM EST
Updated: Sunday, 22 January 2017 6:42 PM EST

Newer | Latest | Older